Six Toxic Words to Ruin Your Mediation

Six Toxic Words to Ruin Your Mediation

When it comes to settling a conflict through the mediation process, you want to make sure every word you use is meaningful and purposeful. However, for those who are not familiar with the world of mediation, there are some words which can have a catastrophic effect on settlement possibilities. In this blog post we will take an in depth look at six “toxic” words commonly seen during Mediation proceedings so both clients and lawyers alike can avoid any potential mishaps along the way.

The power of words during mediation and why it’s important to watch what you say

Mediation can be a powerful force in resolving conflicts, but it also requires some finesse to get through. One of the most important things to consider when in a mediating situation is the power of words. What you say could serve as the foundation for an agreement, or hold enough weight to derail any progress made thus far. It’s essential to be aware of both the literal and figurative meanings of the words used during mediation because they can have a significant influence on how the case concludes. Thoughtful discourse and respectful communication are paramount to facilitate a successful negotiation.  Basically, make sure your words don’t end up doing more harm than good!

First Word – “Never” – Why this word can cause an impasse in a settlement

The word “never” when used in settlement negotiations is a surefire way to put an immediate stop to discussions. No matter what scenario or context, it is totally unproductive and it communicates a complete unwillingness to compromise. In fact, throwing the word out there during mediation could be viewed as a declaration of war.  By immediately setting an adversarial tone, “never” will do little more than send both parties back to square one.

Yes, sometimes negotiations require a firm stance. But, stepping away from the table with hardline terms like “never” achieves nothing. Let’s try leaving such inflammatory language at the door and work together for a positive outcome. 

Second Word – “Can’t” – Why this simple word can shut down negotiation progress

“Can’t” is a deceptively powerful word! We often think of it as a harmless negation – an easy refusal, or a way to retreat from an uncomfortable situation. In the context of settling a case through mediation, however, “can’t” carries a nasty burden. By simply saying “I can’t”, a party can give an impression they are unwilling to go any further in negotiation.  Such a conclusion could easily be the death knell for any chance of resolution.

In contrast, choose phrases to build toward mutually beneficial negotiations,   Phrases such as “let me investigate that further” or “let me discuss this with my team” communicates a person may not be thrilled with a proposal, but leaves open the possibility of progress. Remember – when it comes to mediation, “can’t” can cost you!

Third Word – “Contingency” – How using conditions hinders success

When mediating, it’s important to keep an open mind and avoid placing conditions on the desired outcome. The word “contingency” is especially discouraged for this reason. Even if two parties theoretically agree during mediation, introducing expectations or contingencies can break any already formed agreement. After all, in an ideal world the goal of a negotiation would be to come to one clear compromise, not several small ones all attached with individual strings! Ensuring there is no hidden agenda or “if-then” policies will guarantee that everyone is on an even playing field and working towards one common goal – settling a case.

Fourth Word – “Fair” – Why “Fair” is the F-word.

When it comes to mediation, “fair” is the F-word because all too often, both parties focus only on what is fair for them instead of looking for solutions. This idea of fairness is subjective and can create roadblocks in reaching agreements that benefit everyone.

Instead of focusing on “fair”, turn to negotiation skills and compromise.  This will take you much further than the debate about who deserves what. Aiming for a good business decision you can live will take you much farther than focusing on what is or is not fair.  After all, when two parties work together to create an outcome that is good for both sides, everybody wins.

Fifth Word – “Fault” – assigning blame is a recipe for disengagement

The fifth word to avoid in attempted case resolution through mediation is “fault”. In the quest for peace and agreement between parties, pointing the finger will earn little progress. All too often, attempts at assigning blame only serve to destroy the chances of each side getting what they want in a peaceful manner. It’s important for successful negotiation to keep blame out of the equation.  It’s a recipe for disengagement that won’t yield good results!

Sixth Word – “Should” – Why the tyranny of the “shoulds” can destroy progress

When it comes to settling a case during mediation, the word “should” is often like an uninvited party crasher – it can derail progress and throw a wrench into negotiations. By putting expectations on the other person or making one side feel their choice is wrong, the guilt of a “should” can create tension and damage any idea of compromise. Committing to the tyranny of shoulds can render both parties unable to move beyond limited thinking and prevents creative solutions. As such, it’s wise counsel to avoid “should” while mediating; unless, of course, you like adding fuel to an already tense situation!

The Six Toxic Words to Destroy Your Negotiation

  • Never
  • Can’t
  • Contingency
  • Fair
  • Fault
  • Should

"Stressed

"Need

Remember, there is no such thing as impasse in mediation! When you are stuck, it doesn’t mean you storm away from the table and declare a failure. It just means you and your mediation team haven’t found the right proposal yet.

"Download

Here’s a great little cheat sheet you can use during negotiations to become a pro at negotiating. Follow the tips on this sheet and make specific and plausible proposals based on rational evaluation rather than emotions.

Conclusion

As the ability for parties to reach a settlement often lies in the hands of what is said, the six toxic words explored in this post are ones that should be watched out for if you want to stay on track during a mediation. Although finding the right combination of words is challenging, avoiding these six particular words will help ensure successful negotiations during mediation and a positive outcome.

Know any other toxic words?

These aren’t the only toxic words which can ruin a mediation.  Which ones can you identify?  Share your toxic words and phrases in the comments!

Family Lawyers: Don’t oversell your case with “retainer talk”

Family Lawyers: Don’t oversell your case with “retainer talk”

Some attorneys make the mistake of engaging in “retainer talk.” This has long been a practice among less scrupulous lawyers.  They try to convince their clients they have the best legal strategy- even if they don’t. However, over-promising with dishonest “retainer talk” when speaking with leads can lead to disastrous consequences.

When it comes to a law practice, one thing is certain: your clients will expect (and even demand) results.  Attorneys feel pressure to sell more than they can deliver to attract business.  But as you know, legal outcomes are hard to predict.  As a result, overselling is never a good plan.

Defining the term “retainer talk” and why it can damage your case

Attorneys describe “retainer talk” as talks between a lawyer and potential client where the former makes promises to secure the client’s business. It can range from simply inflating the lawyer’s abilities to making empty promises about case outcomes.

Although some attorneys may think retainer talk is an acceptable business practice, it is actually a damaging habit causing serious repercussions for both lawyers and clients. When engaging in this type of conversation, lawyers forget their clients want win cases but don’t want their lawyer to lie to them.  Truly, honesty about potential outcomes is best.

When clients enter into an attorney-client relationship based on unrealistic estimations set by attorneys, they will be left disappointed if expectations are not met.  Of course this can lead to costly fee and malpractice disputes. Because making unrealistic guarantees or expectations can damage trust between lawyers and clients, it can get you sued!

Tips on how to avoid “retainer talk” when preparing for a lawyer-client meeting

Lawyers face a delicate balance when they offer advice to their clients: providing sound, knowledgeable counsel without losing the client.  There’s a balance for lawyers to ensure their client fully understands the legal process without turning the client off and losing the case.  However, it is less likely you will regret unvarnished, honest advice.  Contrastingly, overly-optimistic promises tend to get lawyers in trouble.

One answer is simpler than you might think – preparation! Researching a case before taking it on can help attorneys understand the lay of the land and help them in determining an action plan for their clients. Moreover, working through potential questions and root causes prior to a meeting can provide vital context and allow lawyers to provide critical guidance that can make all the difference. Ultimately, putting in the effort beforehand enables attorneys to stay focused on the goal of providing wise counsel without running into “retainer talk”.

Showcasing alternative strategies to communicate with clients without over-promising results

Lawyers can be notorious for their hyperbolic language when dealing with clients, leading to oversold expectations. Thankfully, there are alternatives to this practice.

Never underestimate the persuasive power of the phrase “it depends”! Such a statement still allows lawyers to present an array of options while underlining caveats and encouraging balance in decision-making. Moreover, dedicating time to educate clients on the legal spectrum and risk involved create more meaningful relationships while setting healthier expectations—win-win!

Ideas on how to maintain ethical standards while maintaining good relationships with clients

Lawyers need to work with their clients effectively while also ensuring they are maintaining the highest level of ethical standards.  That’s a tricky tightrope to navigate!

It is important to lay down the ground rules early, prioritizing the needs of the client while staying within legal boundaries. Create achievable goals where both parties understand what is expected, and anticipate potential pitfalls and review options for solutions. Ultimately, lawyers will build up a good rapport with clients as they trust that their needs will be met ethically.

Clients feel valued when they are heard.  As such, it’s essential for lawyers to not just pay attention but also remember clients’ preferences from meeting-to-meeting.  This helps continue to foster positive client relationships. Rather than take a back seat and depend completely on clients’ instructions, lawyers should proactively advocate for policies that promote professional conduct and trust on both sides.

Ultimately, a lawyer should make their relationship with the client simple and straightforward. Refraining from “retainer talk” is an important way to preserve that relationship. As you strive to practice law responsibly and follow ethical guidelines, always keep in mind the importance of remaining transparent, honest, and forthright when speaking with clients. Don’t fall into the trap of engaging in “retainer talk”—it’s not worth it! Remember a legal professional’s responsibilities extend beyond achieving positive case outcomes for the clients. Good ethics will take you far in this profession.  You’ll be much better off being an unbiased adviser than promising something you can’t deliver.