Failure to follow California’s strict disclosure rules can be very expensive in divorce cases.

California Duty of Disclosure

In California, it is essential in every dissolution, divorce, nullity or legal separation case to make a full and complete disclosure.

Young black man filling out income and expense declaration fl-150 and schedule of assets and debts fl-142

California Family Code § 721 requires full disclosure in divorce cases.

California Family Code § 721

The duties of disclosure are largely controlled by California Family Code § 721, which describes the fiduciary duties between spouses. It provides, in part:

[A] husband and wife are subject to the general rules governing fiduciary relationships which control the actions of persons occupying confidential relations with each other. This confidential relationship imposes a duty of the highest good faith and fair dealing on each spouse, and neither shall take any unfair advantage of the other.

California Family Code § 721 (b).

The statute goes further to subscribe to marriages the same sort of fiduciary duties that exist between business partners. It indicates that, as with business partners, the confidential relationship between spouses is

(b)…a fiduciary relationship subject to the same rights and duties of nonmarital business partners, as provided in Sections 16403, 16404, and 16503 of the Corporations Code, including, but not limited to, the following:

(1)Providing each spouse access at all times to any books kept regarding a transaction for the purposes of inspection and copying.

(2)Rendering upon request, true and full information of all things affecting any transaction which concerns the community property. Nothing in this section is intended to impose a duty for either spouse to keep detailed books and records of community property transactions.

(3)Accounting to the spouse, and holding as a trustee, any benefit or profit derived from any transaction by one spouse without the consent of the other spouse which concerns the community property.

Id.

Family Code § 2102

With this in mind, the California Family Code has specific disclosure rules. Per Family Code § 2102, parties are subject to the § 721 fiduciary standards.  This goes from the time of separation until the distribution of the community assets. Section 2102 requires the following:

(1)The accurate and complete disclosure of all assets and liabilities in which the party has or may have an interest or obligation and all current earnings, accumulations, and expenses, including an immediate, full, and accurate update or augmentation to the extent there have been any material changes.

(2)The accurate and complete written disclosure of any investment opportunity, business opportunity, or other income-producing opportunity that presents itself after the date of separation, but that results from any investment, significant business activity outside the ordinary course of business, or other income-producing opportunity of either spouse from the date of marriage to the date of separation, inclusive. The written disclosure shall be made in sufficient time for the other spouse to make an informed decision as to whether he or she desires to participate in the investment opportunity, business, or other potential income-producing opportunity, and for the court to resolve any dispute regarding the right of the other spouse to participate in the opportunity. In the event of nondisclosure of an investment opportunity, the division of any gain resulting from that opportunity is governed by the standard provided in Section 2556.

(3)The operation or management of a business or an interest in a business in which the community may have an interest.

Family Code § 2102(a).

Duty to Update and Augment Disclosures

It is important to note that the code not only requires a complete disclosure, but it also requires “immediate, full, and accurate update or augmentation to that extent that there have been material changes.” Id [emphasis added]. This means that after you provide your first disclosure, you must update the other party when there are changes.

Preliminary and Final Declarations of Disclosure

Before the court will grant a judgment for divorce, the parties must exchange preliminary and final declarations of disclosure. Parties can waive the final declaration of disclosure by written stipulation of the parties.  But, they can’t waive the preliminary disclosures.  See Family Code §§ 2104 and 2105. The statute requires that the parties use specified forms for the disclosures. They are:

Declaration of Disclosure (Judicial Counsel Form FL-140)

Complete this form and sign under penalty of perjury to indicate that you have made a complete and accurate disclosure.  Don’t file this form.  Rather, just serve it on the other party.

Income and Expense Declaration (Judicial Counsel Form FL-150)

On form Fl-150 you provide all of your income and expense data.  You show everything you earn and everything you spend.  It’s kind of a “budgety” type form.  This aids the court and the spouses in determining the best choices for child support and alimony.  You only need to file the form FL-150 if support is at issue at a court hearing.  Otherwise, just serve it with your Declaration of Disclosure form.

Schedule of Assets and Debts (Judicial Counsel Form FL-142)

On form FL-142 you list all of your assets and debts.  In essence, it shows everything you own and everything you owe.  Be sure to list EVERYTHING.  There can be consequences if you leave something off.  So, when in doubt, disclose.  You don’t file form FL-142 at court.  Instead, just serve it on the other party with your Declaration of Disclosure.

Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure (Judicial Counsel Form FL-141)

This form indicates to the court that you completed your declaration of disclosure and served it on the other spouse.  File this one at court.

Importantly, you only need to file the Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure form at court. Rather than filing, you simply serve the other documents on the other party. However, despite not filing them at court, it is essential to take these forms seriously and to be complete and truthful. The court can be very harsh with people who are inaccurate or incomplete in their disclosures.  So, get this one right too.

Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Disclosure Requirements

Family Code § 2107(c) requires monetary sanctions and reasonable attorney fees if a party fails to comply with the spouse’s California Family Code § 721 fiduciary duty of disclosure during dissolution proceedings. Family Code §271(a) provides authority to order attorney fees and costs in the nature of a sanction if conduct “frustrates the policy of the law to promote settlement of litigation.”

In summary, the disclosure required by California Family Code § 721 is not a topic to mess around with. The court must impose Draconian penalties and sanctions on parties who do not comply with the disclosure statutes. Hence, the best advice is to err on the side of caution. Disclose everything and anything to the other side even if you think it is unimportant. Do it early and thoroughly.  What’s more, Augment and update routinely.  I have seen even the smallest technicality lead a court to set aside a judgment or order stiff sanctions. So, it is simply best to play it safe and disclose it all. Withholding information, whether it is inadvertent or an attempt to be sneaky or cute, can lead to devastating results. If you are not sure if you have disclosed everything necessary, then talk to an attorney and get it right.

For more information, read:

https://weberdisputeresolution.com/california-child-support/

https://weberdisputeresolution.com/early-intervention-mediation-settlement-conference-divorce-case/

https://weberdisputeresolution.com/pre-mediation-information-packet-2/

Judge has harsh words for Mom before sentencing her for spanking her kid

 

 

 

 

Judge has harsh words for Mom before sentencing her for spanking her kid

See this article about a Texan judged who sentenced a mother for felony abuse charges after she spanked her child.  Note, she did not use a belt or leave any bruises, just some red marks.

Judge Jose Longoria said, “You don’t spank children today.”

It seems that more and more courts are taking a strong stance against spankings.  I am not sure I agree with such a hardline, but we are certainly seeing more and more bannings of corporal punishment in our family law cases in San Diego.

What do you think?  Is spanking inappropriate all the time or are there times when spanking is ok?

Why I absolutely love Collaborative Practice for Resolving Divorce Cases.

Collaborative Practice offers the promise of peaceful negotiation with maximum professional support.

I have been involved in matrimonial law most of my career. I have seen some pretty awful stuff. People come to my office at the worst time of their lives: a family in pain; lovers betrayed. As the family is the very heart of our existence and interaction as men and women, the demise of a marriage thrusts real, honest people into some of the deepest and most exquisite pain we humans are capable of experiencing. Divorce professionals, for better or for worse, are given a front row seat to such sorrow and tragedy. We go through a lot of tissue. I have seen a coffee cup thrown across a room. I have seen strong, grown men cry. I have seen suicide attempts and suicide successes.


 

children, kids, custody, visitation, parenting, coparenting, collaborative practice


 

I have seen the serious collateral damage that a divorce war can inflict on the most innocent – children. I witnessed divorces that were so acrimonious in their conflict that the children of the marriage were literally destroyed by the drug and alcohol addiction that so often accompanies children of divorce, and they had to eventually be admitted into Rehab centers like Arista Recovery (https://www.aristarecovery.com/) to overcome their addiction phase.

Early in my career, I enjoyed the thrill of a battle in court. Litigation can be intoxicating for an attorney. I experienced the adrenaline rush of a nasty phone call to an opposing counsel, the delivery of a strongly worded letter on attorneys’ stationary and the excitement of combat in the court room. It is easy to allow oneself to get caught up in the warfare and become a part of the problem rather than a guide to a solution. In law school we are taught to be “zealous advocates” for our clients. The problem, however, is that in our zeal, we often overlook and destroy our client’s most important asset – the family relationships. Furthermore, “zeal” with its weaponry of formal discovery, motions, court work and general nastiness can deplete the family finances in such an extreme way that our clients are left bankrupt. Sometimes I feel like some attorneys are more zealous advocates of collecting more fees than they are of doing what is best for the client. It is actually called the “adversarial process” in that parties are purposely pitted against one another. Surely, encouraging couples to be adversarial rather than constructive and mutual when discussing delicate issues like parenting is terrible for a family. Don’t get me wrong, some cases require a court battle. However, the vast majority do not.

collaborative practice keeps people out of court

I have since recovered from the mindset that everything must be scorched earth. Towards the beginning of my career I did mediation, which was a great way to keep folks out of court and focus on solutions. The limitations of mediation, however, are that the parties don’t often have the support of advising attorneys in the room. As a neutral mediator, I am unable to advise what is in a party’s best interests. I can’t protect the interests of my clients. I always recommend that clients seek independent legal advice, but it is hard sometimes, if the attorney is not in the room. On the other side of the same coin, some advising attorneys misunderstand their role and drive what could otherwise be a simple mediated case into litigation.

In Collaborative Practice, however, the parties and their attorneys jointly sign an agreement that they will not be going to court. The agreement further stipulates that should either party choose to litigate, both attorneys are disqualified from participating. This frees the attorney from having to posture with every meeting. If the attorneys are not constantly concerned that they will have to litigate every issue, they are freed to focus on solutions rather than looking for more conflict. The attorneys’ roles switch from zealous advocates to “legal educators” and “counselors at law”. The power shifts away from the attorneys to the parties. The parties decide what the agreement will be and the attorneys merely provide advice regarding the law.

Additionally, the parties can bring in additional professionals to work on their Collaborative Practice team. Mental health professionals can be utilized as divorce coaches or child specialists to assist with the hugely emotional issues in every divorce case. A neutral financial professional can be brought in to assist the parties with understanding the money issues and for planning for the future. As an attorney, I am then relieved of the burden of having to act (incompetently) as an emotional support, child custody expert or as a financial guide. Often these additional professionals will have a lower billing rate than the attorneys so tremendous economies of scale can be achieved. You pay money to the people most qualified to give the particular service.

I enjoy Collaborative Practice as a human being as well. It is wonderful to work with a collaborative practice preserves familiiescouple to transition their family in the least destructive manner possible. I love collaborating with professionals from other disciplines to help the family find the very best solutions for their situation. Collaborative Practice is much more mutually respectful, civil, child-centered and humane than traditional litigation. Although divorce is always painful no matter which model of dispute resolution is used, couples can leave the collaborative divorce process feeling good about their futures and knowing that they found constructive solutions for their families.

For more information about Collaborative Practice, contact Shawn Weber for a consultation at 858-410-0144 or view:

https://weberdisputeresolution.com/explore-our-services/collaborative-divorce/

https://weberdisputeresolution.com/collaborative-divorce-a-safe-place/

See also:

Collaborative Practice California

Collaborative Family Law Group of San Diego

International Academy of Collaborative Professionals

 

collaborative practice, san diego divorce attorney, collaborative divorce, solana beach divorce attorney, Shawn Weber

Will He Let You Move?


Good article with tough questions about move-away cases. I note that in California­, it has gotten a lot harder for a primary parent to move than it was a few years ago. I am involved in a case right now where the primary question is the detriment issue. I feel bad for judges that have to decide these tough cases.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

www.BraveWeberMack.com