What effect does adultery have on a California divorce?

Shawn Weber, Attorney and Mediator

The short answer is “none” because California is a “no-fault” state.

This means that evidence of adultery, as a general rule, is not permissible in court as it is not relevant. However, perhaps that answer is a bit simplistic. Evidence of an affair can come in if it is used to prove a fact that is relevant.

For example, I had a case several years ago where the husband had used community property funds to purchase expensive jewelry for his mistress. I represented the wife and brought the evidence of the jewelry purchase into evidence – not to show that there was adultery, but that the Husband had violated his fiduciary duties by secretly purchasing the very expensive jewelry with community property funds. In another case, I was able to bring evidence of of an affair in where the opposing party had invited the parties’ five-year-old child to sleep between her and her boyfriend. Again, I did not bring the evidence in to show that there was cheating. Rather, the evidence came in to show that the minor child was inappropriately being exposed to her mother’s sexual behavior.

So, the rule in a nutshell is that evidence of adultery generally does not come into evidence because the fact that an it occurred is not relevant in a no-fault state. However, where the evidence that shows that adultery occurred also shows that something occurred that is relevant, the evidence can come in, but only to show the truthfulness of the relevant fact and not the alleged adultery. (That the judge learns of the adultery as a consequence is a nice little bonus.) Importantly, the mere fact that adultery occurred cannot be considered by the court in dividing property, dividing debt, awarding support, awarding attorneys’ fees or determining child custody in a divorce.

Be careful about what you allege in divorce court!

In a divorce case, there can be a real temptation to let the Divorce Court know just exactly how terrible you think the other party is. That can backfire, however, if you are not careful. For instance, I had a trial once in divorce court where my client testified to the judge about just how nutty and insane he thought his wife was. He told the court all about her suicide attempts, depression and drug use. What happened is the judge then began to develop a narrative in his own analysis of the case that the wife was incapable of working, which would have severely increased my client’s alimony obligation. Luckily, some quick thinking diverted the court away from this narrative and my client did ok. But, it was a very close call.

What is the moral to the story? Be careful what you allege in divorce court. Sometimes facts that you think will help can actually be counterproductive and harmful to your case. A good rule of thumb is that you only share what is going to tell your story as you (and your lawyer) want the judge to hear it. If in doubt (especially when alleging negative aspects about the other person’s character) run it by your attorney. Don’t drop an unexpected bomb in divorce court.

Shawn Weber, Attorney and Mediator