Be careful about what you allege in divorce court!

by | May 14, 2010 | Uncategorized | 2 comments

In a divorce case, there can be a real temptation to let the Divorce Court know just exactly how terrible you think the other party is. That can backfire, however, if you are not careful. For instance, I had a trial once in divorce court where my client testified to the judge about just how nutty and insane he thought his wife was. He told the court all about her suicide attempts, depression and drug use. What happened is the judge then began to develop a narrative in his own analysis of the case that the wife was incapable of working, which would have severely increased my client’s alimony obligation. Luckily, some quick thinking diverted the court away from this narrative and my client did ok. But, it was a very close call.

What is the moral to the story? Be careful what you allege in divorce court. Sometimes facts that you think will help can actually be counterproductive and harmful to your case. A good rule of thumb is that you only share what is going to tell your story as you (and your lawyer) want the judge to hear it. If in doubt (especially when alleging negative aspects about the other person’s character) run it by your attorney. Don’t drop an unexpected bomb in divorce court.

Shawn Weber, Attorney and Mediator

 

Ready to Add Collaborative Divorce to Your Practice?

In-person in San Diego | June 26-28, 2026

Collaborative Divorce Trainers Shawn Weber, CLS-F, Myra Fleischer, CLS-F, Nancy Ross, LCSW, Mark Hill, CFP, CDFA, Jaye-jo Portanova, MD

If you are serious about learning collaborative divorce, this is a rare opportunity to train with a world-class faculty including Nancy Ross, LCSW, Mark Hill, CFP, CDFA, Jaye-Jo Portanova, M.D., Myra Fleischer,  J.D., CLS-F and Shawn Weber, JD, CLS-F. Each brings decades of experience and a deep understanding of how Collaborative Divorce actually work in practice.

This is a hands-on training. You will see how the roles function, how the team works together, and how structure holds when the conversation gets difficult. You will practice the skills, not just hear about them.

Opportunities to learn directly from a group like this do not come around often.

The process requires structure, a clear understanding of roles, and the ability to work effectively within a team. Those are skills that can be learned and developed with the right training and experience.

If you are a family law professional looking to expand your skillset or shift how you approach cases, collaborative practice offers a meaningful path forward.

2 Comments

  1. Lucille Uttermohlen

    The admonition not to drop a bomb on your lawyer in court is a good one. If you tell the court some new tidbit that you haven’t shared with your lawyer ahead of time, she might not be able to ask questions that will mitigate the damage. It is also true that you aren’t doing yourself a favor by trying to sneak in information that hasn’t been requested. Your lawyer may have a good reason not to elicit that information, and if you squeeze it in anyway, you could be annoying the judge. to

    • Shawn Weber

      Thanks! It’s true. You NEVER want to surprise your attorney. Always talk it through with your attorney first.