The National Law Review: IRA Rollover trap in divorce cases
The National Law Review: IRA Rollover trap in divorce cases. What do you think? http://ow.ly/AdyTe
The National Law Review: IRA Rollover trap in divorce cases. What do you think? http://ow.ly/AdyTe
Rules regarding who can claim a child on his/her taxes can be found in IRS Publication 596. In general, you can only qualify to claim a child for a tax credit or dependency exemption if the child has lived with you for over half of the year. For those parents that aren’t sure exactly how to file their taxes now that they’re divorced, it might be worthwhile contacting H&R Block for tax support. They can provide useful advice about claiming children on tax reports to make sure the report is done on time. Raise even has some promo codes for H&R Block on their website (go now). Hopefully, that will help.
Child care is difficult when parents are divorced, especially when it comes to tax. Sometimes in crafting child support orders, family law professionals and courts deliberately plan to give the noncustodial parent the dependency exemption and child tax credit. This is especially true if the support recipient has lower income and is in a lower tax bracket and the supporting parent is in a higher tax bracket. The party in the higher tax bracket may be able to make better use of the exemption and credit. Sometimes allowing that person to claim a child will enable us to order a higher amount of support because there is more disposable income available to pay support. It’s a win-win for everyone.
The IRS allows the noncustodial parent to claim a child if each of the following requirements are met:
“1. The parents:
a. Are divorced or legally separated under a decree of divorce or separate
maintenance,
b. Are separated under a written separation agreement, or
c. Lived apart at all times during the last 6 months of 2012, whether or not they are
or were married.
2. The child received over half of his or her support for the year from the parents.
3. The child is in the custody of one or both parents for more than half of 2012.
4. Either of the following statements is true.
a. The custodial parent signs Form 8332 or a substantially similar statement that he
or she will not claim the child as a dependent for the year, and the noncustodial
parent attaches the form or statement to his or her return. If the divorce decree or
separation agreement went into effect after 1984 and before 2009, the
noncustodial parent may be able to attach certain pages from the decree or
agreement instead of Form 8332.
b. A pre-1985 decree of divorce or separate maintenance or written separation
agreement that applies to 2012 provides that the noncustodial parent can claim
the child as a dependent, and the noncustodial parent provides at least $600 for
support of the child during 2012.”
IRS Publication 596 (2012) [http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p596.pdf].
Remember, without a signed Form 8332 or equivalent, the noncustodial parent may not claim the child.
This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Remember, because every case is different, nothing replaces personalized advice from a professional. For further discussion of divorce and custody related tax issues, call attorney Shawn Weber at 858-410-0144 for a free telephone conference or go to his website at n4d.8c6.myftpupload.com/.
In California, it is essential in every dissolution, divorce, nullity or legal separation case to make a full and complete disclosure.
The duties of disclosure are largely controlled by California Family Code § 721, which describes the fiduciary duties between spouses. It provides, in part:
[A] husband and wife are subject to the general rules governing fiduciary relationships which control the actions of persons occupying confidential relations with each other. This confidential relationship imposes a duty of the highest good faith and fair dealing on each spouse, and neither shall take any unfair advantage of the other.
California Family Code § 721 (b).
The statute goes further to subscribe to marriages the same sort of fiduciary duties that exist between business partners. It indicates that, as with business partners, the confidential relationship between spouses is
(b)…a fiduciary relationship subject to the same rights and duties of nonmarital business partners, as provided in Sections 16403, 16404, and 16503 of the Corporations Code, including, but not limited to, the following:
(1)Providing each spouse access at all times to any books kept regarding a transaction for the purposes of inspection and copying.
(2)Rendering upon request, true and full information of all things affecting any transaction which concerns the community property. Nothing in this section is intended to impose a duty for either spouse to keep detailed books and records of community property transactions.
(3)Accounting to the spouse, and holding as a trustee, any benefit or profit derived from any transaction by one spouse without the consent of the other spouse which concerns the community property.
Id.
With this in mind, the California Family Code has specific disclosure rules. Per Family Code § 2102, parties are subject to the § 721 fiduciary standards. This goes from the time of separation until the distribution of the community assets. Section 2102 requires the following:
(1)The accurate and complete disclosure of all assets and liabilities in which the party has or may have an interest or obligation and all current earnings, accumulations, and expenses, including an immediate, full, and accurate update or augmentation to the extent there have been any material changes.
(2)The accurate and complete written disclosure of any investment opportunity, business opportunity, or other income-producing opportunity that presents itself after the date of separation, but that results from any investment, significant business activity outside the ordinary course of business, or other income-producing opportunity of either spouse from the date of marriage to the date of separation, inclusive. The written disclosure shall be made in sufficient time for the other spouse to make an informed decision as to whether he or she desires to participate in the investment opportunity, business, or other potential income-producing opportunity, and for the court to resolve any dispute regarding the right of the other spouse to participate in the opportunity. In the event of nondisclosure of an investment opportunity, the division of any gain resulting from that opportunity is governed by the standard provided in Section 2556.
(3)The operation or management of a business or an interest in a business in which the community may have an interest.
Family Code § 2102(a).
It is important to note that the code not only requires a complete disclosure, but it also requires “immediate, full, and accurate update or augmentation to that extent that there have been material changes.” Id [emphasis added]. This means that after you provide your first disclosure, you must update the other party when there are changes.
Before the court will grant a judgment for divorce, the parties must exchange preliminary and final declarations of disclosure. Parties can waive the final declaration of disclosure by written stipulation of the parties. But, they can’t waive the preliminary disclosures. See Family Code §§ 2104 and 2105. The statute requires that the parties use specified forms for the disclosures. They are:
Complete this form and sign under penalty of perjury to indicate that you have made a complete and accurate disclosure. Don’t file this form. Rather, just serve it on the other party.
On form Fl-150 you provide all of your income and expense data. You show everything you earn and everything you spend. It’s kind of a “budgety” type form. This aids the court and the spouses in determining the best choices for child support and alimony. You only need to file the form FL-150 if support is at issue at a court hearing. Otherwise, just serve it with your Declaration of Disclosure form.
On form FL-142 you list all of your assets and debts. In essence, it shows everything you own and everything you owe. Be sure to list EVERYTHING. There can be consequences if you leave something off. So, when in doubt, disclose. You don’t file form FL-142 at court. Instead, just serve it on the other party with your Declaration of Disclosure.
This form indicates to the court that you completed your declaration of disclosure and served it on the other spouse. File this one at court.
Importantly, you only need to file the Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure form at court. Rather than filing, you simply serve the other documents on the other party. However, despite not filing them at court, it is essential to take these forms seriously and to be complete and truthful. The court can be very harsh with people who are inaccurate or incomplete in their disclosures. So, get this one right too.
Family Code § 2107(c) requires monetary sanctions and reasonable attorney fees if a party fails to comply with the spouse’s California Family Code § 721 fiduciary duty of disclosure during dissolution proceedings. Family Code §271(a) provides authority to order attorney fees and costs in the nature of a sanction if conduct “frustrates the policy of the law to promote settlement of litigation.”
In summary, the disclosure required by California Family Code § 721 is not a topic to mess around with. The court must impose Draconian penalties and sanctions on parties who do not comply with the disclosure statutes. Hence, the best advice is to err on the side of caution. Disclose everything and anything to the other side even if you think it is unimportant. Do it early and thoroughly. What’s more, Augment and update routinely. I have seen even the smallest technicality lead a court to set aside a judgment or order stiff sanctions. So, it is simply best to play it safe and disclose it all. Withholding information, whether it is inadvertent or an attempt to be sneaky or cute, can lead to devastating results. If you are not sure if you have disclosed everything necessary, then talk to an attorney and get it right.
https://weberdisputeresolution.com/california-child-support/
https://weberdisputeresolution.com/early-intervention-mediation-settlement-conference-divorce-case/
https://weberdisputeresolution.com/pre-mediation-information-packet-2/
![]()
The author in this article presents a very interesting take on fidelity in marriage. The idea of “financial fidelity” is a good one. So many of my divorce clients arive at the decision to end their marriages over money issues. As a divorce professional, I appreciate the advice to have a moderate response with financial “cheating” is discovered. Many of my clients opt for a postnuptial agreement when such happens as a way to prevent the marriage from disintegrating. Having a written agreement with clear understandings of the financial boundaries and what is expected from a spouse can have a huge impact on the success or failure of the marriage going forward. I also support having the prenup discussion prior to marriage so that a marrying couple can have the money conversation. This prevents misunderstandings and incorrect expectations from developing down the road.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost