2025 Divorce Mediation Lessons: Reflections From a Year in the Room

2025 Divorce Mediation Lessons: Reflections From a Year in the Room

A year of divorce mediation always teaches me something, but the lessons rarely show up the way I expect. After so many years in the chair, I still find myself surprised by people. There is plenty of fear and frustration in the work, and I see my share of rough edges. Even so, this year brought moments that stopped me in my tracks in the best possible way. A few families showed a kind of steadiness and generosity that reminded me why this work matters.

One couple in particular stays with me. These folks made a choice to build their agreement around the needs of their children and each other, not what the law might dictate. The monied spouse said something I almost never hear in a mediation room. They said they did not care what the law said. They wanted this to be right. Period.

From there, everything shifted. They built a plan that kept their kids stable and gave both parents a firm footing. The agreement was generous and thoughtful, and their attorneys helped make sure the details worked. When we wrapped up, the room felt warm and steady, with no drama and no scorekeeping. These were simply two solid people trying to leave the marriage with their dignity intact and their children protected. Those kids will be all right.

The Weight People Carried This Year

Folks came into divorce mediation tired this year, more than usual. The world has been heavy. People are stretched financially, politically, and emotionally. They walk into my office already burned out and impatient, and that exhaustion spills right into the marriage and the divorce.

Fear was the emotion I saw most often. When people are afraid, they try to control everything in sight, including the schedule, the money, the rules, and each other. That kind of control only tightens the knot.

Parents were terrified their kids might be damaged by the divorce, yet oddly enough, the kids often seemed stronger than the parents. After the pandemic years, many young people bounced back with a kind of resilience that surprised everyone. The parents carried more anxiety than the kids did.

Financial stress showed up in every corner. Cash flow is tight. Housing in San Diego County feels impossible to find. People do not want to lose a low mortgage rate. Renting is often more expensive than staying put. Refinancing can blow up a budget. I saw more deferred sales this year than I have in a long time. Underneath all of it lives a quiet worry that retirement will not be affordable. Inflation spooked many people.

Slower Is Faster

When people arrived half-crazed and locked in fight-or-flight, the most reliable response was to slow the pace of the conversation, encourage a full breath, and allow the room to settle into a calmer rhythm.

People come in like cornered raccoons right now. You can feel the anxiety sitting in their bodies. Giving them a moment to breathe and think clearly changed everything. Slower truly was faster.

Empathy also needed more intentional coaching this year. In a polarized world, people forget how to imagine someone else’s experience. A simple question made a big difference. I would ask, “What would the other person need from a settlement?”

It pulled them out of their own fear and into a bigger frame.

The Patterns That Kept Showing Up

Throughout the year, I saw consistent patterns, each of which held a meaningful divorce mediation lesson.

Fear became control. People did not start out wanting to be controlling. They were scared. Naming that helped soften the room.

People misunderstood what the law requires. Parents came in insisting a 50/50 schedule was mandatory. It is not. The law cares about best interest, not perfect math. And support orders do not usually result in a 50/50 split of spendable income. Helping people let go of those myths took patience.

People thought they communicated poorly when they really just disagreed. That one came up constantly. They would say they had terrible communication. In reality, they communicated pretty well. They simply did not agree. When we talked about disagreement as a normal part of divorce, people stopped jumping to worst-case scenarios.

Generosity showed up more than expected. People erred on the side of kindness this year. When they shifted from protecting themselves to caring about the other person’s well-being, the whole energy changed.

I had to hold my own still center. Mediators live in the world too. This year tested that. My own anxiety about politics, economics, and humanity wanted to sneak into the room. I had to keep myself grounded.

Meditation helped. Talking with trusted colleagues helped. Even during a session, quiet mantras kept me steady: “They see the world differently than I do. That does not change who I am or how I show up.”

What People Did Better This Year

Even though the world felt mean and loud, people actually listened to each other more. Many couples had been in therapy before arriving in my office. They could not save their marriage, but the skills they learned in counseling helped them divorce with more care.

Couples relied on the skills they had practiced, including active listening, clearer communication, and a renewed sense of humility. Those efforts made a meaningful difference in how their mediations unfolded.

Heading Into the New Year

Peace is not the absence of conflict. It is the mastery of it.

People find peace by learning how to be steady when they disagree. Disagreement is normal. Fighting is optional. The moment people stop fighting, compromise becomes possible.

A Word to My Fellow Mediators

Mediators carry a lot, often more than people realize. It’s so important for us to allow ourselves room to breathe and remember that we are human in all of this. The work can knock any of us around. As we head into a new year, I hope we can find a little more steadiness, a little more kindness toward ourselves, and the space to keep mastering our craft.

Dividing the Stuff: Dividing Personal Property in a Divorce Without Losing Your Cool

Dividing the Stuff: Dividing Personal Property in a Divorce Without Losing Your Cool

For many people, dividing personal property in divorce ends up being harder than dividing money.

It surprises them.

The house, the retirement accounts, even support can feel abstract. The furniture, dishes, artwork, photos, and small personal items are not. Those things lived with you. They witnessed the relationship. They carry stories. The house is the marriage museum.

I have seen couples who resolved complex financial issues fairly quickly, only to grind to a halt over pots and pans, the washer and dryer, or a box of knick-knacks collected over years of shared life. Often the items themselves are not especially valuable. What they represent is.

A piece of artwork recalls a trip taken when things were still good. The silver marks a milestone anniversary. A small figurine was a gift from a child. By the time people reach this stage of divorce, they are already emotionally spent. Dividing personal property can reopen grief in a very tangible way.

Below are some practical guidelines that consistently help people move through this part of the process with less conflict and less expense.

Start with realistic values

When dividing personal property in a divorce, courts generally value household items at garage sale value. That is a useful reality check.

Unless you own rare artwork, high-end antiques, or something truly unique, most household items have limited resale value. Emotional meaning can quietly inflate perceived worth, which makes agreement harder. When in doubt, ask a simple question: what would a neutral third party realistically pay for this item used?

Keeping values grounded helps keep conversations grounded.

Handle most items without lawyers

It rarely makes sense to involve attorneys in deciding who gets the couch, the coffee maker, or the bath mat. Legal fees add up quickly, and disputes over dividing personal property in a divorce can consume time and money out of proportion to their importance.

For high-value or unusual items, professional guidance can be appropriate. For most household property, people are better served handling it directly or with the help of a mediator or coach.

Create an inventory before dividing anything

Before decisions are made, it helps to know what actually exists.  In other words, it helps to define the pie before dividing the pie.

Some people prefer a written list. Others find it easier to walk through the home with a phone or camera and record each room. That record can then be used to create a list later. The method matters less than having a shared reference point.

When dividing personal property in a divorce, an inventory reduces suspicion and keeps the process organized.

Use a simple sorting system

One approach that works well for dividing personal property in a divorce is to sort items into clear categories:

  • Items one person will keep
  • Items the other person will keep
  • Items to sell and divide the proceeds
  • Items to donate or discard

Notice what is missing. There is no category for items people cannot agree on.

When agreement is impossible, selling or donating the item is often the cleanest solution. Another option is taking turns choosing disputed items until they are gone. For highly sentimental objects, some couples choose to pass them on to their children.

The goal is progress, not perfect fairness.

Make a plan for photos and videos

Photographs and videos deserve special care.

I often recommend setting a date when both people will make photos and videos from the marriage available to each other. Each person can then choose what they want duplicated. With current technology, scanning and digital copying are relatively easy and affordable. Sharing duplication costs evenly tends to feel fair.

This approach allows both people to preserve memories without turning them into bargaining chips.

Understand how the law treats pets

Many people are surprised to learn that, legally, pets are considered property. Courts generally have limited patience for extended pet disputes and may order outcomes that satisfy neither person.

Because of that reality, it is usually far better for people to work out pet arrangements themselves. Focus on the animal’s needs and daily life rather than ownership language. Doing so often leads to better outcomes for everyone involved.

Take extra care when safety is an issue

In cases involving domestic violence or restraining orders, dividing personal property requires additional planning.

Direct contact may not be appropriate or allowed. Attorneys, mediators, or agreed-upon third parties can help coordinate inventories and exchanges. Legal orders must be respected, even when emotions are high or items feel urgent.

Dividing personal property in a divorce isn’t worth compromising safety or violating court orders.

See the opportunity in the process

Many people eventually describe dividing personal property in a divorce as unexpectedly clarifying.

Letting go of objects tied to an old chapter can create space for something new. When the process is handled thoughtfully, it can feel less like a loss and more like a transition.

If the emotional weight becomes overwhelming, a divorce coach or neutral professional can provide support at a fraction of the cost of extended legal conflict.

Dividing personal property does not have to become another battleground. With patience, structure, and realistic expectations, most couples can move through it with minimal professional intervention.

At the end of the day, these are things. How you handle them will shape how much conflict you carry forward.ips to divide personal property, san diego divorce, san diego divorce attorney, Shawn Weber, san diego divorce mediator

California’s New Joint Petition: A Game Changer for Divorcing with Respect

California’s New Joint Petition: A Game Changer for Divorcing with Respect

Picture this: John and Lisa walk into the courthouse for the first time with nerves jangling. They hope to end their marriage without it becoming a war. They want to keep things civil, maybe even friendly, for the sake of their family. Starting January 1, 2026, California couples like John and Lisa get a new tool in the toolbox: the Joint Petition. For those of us in mediation or collaborative law, this is a game changer. It’s a big step toward what we’ve always wanted, helping families split up without tearing each other apart. This new process is right in line with what we do every day: keeping things peaceful and focused on the people, not the fight.

Let’s be honest: every divorce in California starts as a lawsuit. The very first page of the standard Petition (FL-100) hits you with a summons that says, “You are being sued.” It’s even repeated in two languages. That kind of language might make sense if you’re gearing up for a fight, but it’s always felt out of place for those of us who believe in mediation or Collaborative Divorce. Finally, with the new joint petition, we get a form that actually fits the way we want to help families, cooperatively.

Now, don’t get me wrong, this doesn’t mean the end of courtroom battles. If you want to fight it out, the old Petition and Response are still there, with all the usual drama. But for couples who’d rather skip the mudslinging, the joint petition takes away that first unnecessary punch. It lets you start the process together, not as enemies.

A Quick Primer on the New Law for California Joint Divorce Petitions

This change comes from SB 1427, which authorized the Judicial Council to create a joint filing process for dissolution and legal separation. The new procedure for joint petitions, implemented through the Judicial Council’s new FL-700 form, becomes available for use on January 1, 2026. The revisions to the California Family Code can be found in section 2320 and related provisions.

The key points:

  • The spouses file a joint petition (FL-700) if they agree to do so.
  • Both parties sign the same form.
  • There will be a new summons (FL-710) with no “service of process” and no adversarial caption. However, the Standard Family Law Restraining Orders still apply just like any other divorce filing. These orders automatically kick in to protect both parties by maintaining the status quo and ensuring peace during divorce proceedings, regardless of the filing method.
  • Both spouses make a general appearance by signing, which means the court has jurisdiction over both parties from the start.
  • The same 6-month waiting period still applies.

Why This Matters for Couples and Professionals

For families, this new form changes everything. It sets the right tone from the start, one of cooperation and respect. Now, instead of one spouse having to “sue” the other, you can file together. It’s a small shift in paperwork but a major change in energy. The joint petition says, “We’re doing this together.” That’s a big deal.

For mediators and collaborative professionals, this is a breath of fresh air. We can help clients complete one shared petition and move forward as co-petitioners. It’s a more human way to begin a hard process.

What to Know Before You File the California Joint Divorce Petition

Like any new system, the joint petition has some details to understand before jumping in:

  • General Appearance
    When both spouses sign the FL-700, they’re telling the court, “We’re here, and you have power over us.” You can’t later say, “Wait, I wasn’t served properly.” Be sure both understand that before signing.
  • Independent Advice
    Each spouse should have the chance to talk with an attorney before signing. Even in mediation, independent legal advice is important.
  • If Cooperation Fails
    If things change and one person wants to back out, either spouse can file a Notice of Revocation of Joint Petition (FL-720). From that point on, the case moves forward like a traditional divorce. The revoking spouse must file a new Petition (FL-100) or Response (FL-120) the same day they revoke.
  • No Defaults
    There’s no such thing as a default in a joint petition because the parties each are making a joint appearance when they file. Both must sign off on any amendments. If one person stops cooperating, progress can stall.
  • Court Transition Period
    Courts will need time to adjust. Expect a few hiccups as clerks and e-filing systems catch up early in 2026.

When Cooperation Breaks Down: Revoking a California Joint Divorce Petition

As with any cooperative process, it does not always stay that way. Not every joint filing stays joint. The new system anticipates that a previously non-adversarial case may later become adversarial. For that, the Judicial Council created Form FL-720 (Notice of Revocation of Joint Petition).

Here’s how it works:

  • Either party may revoke the joint petition at any time before the judgment is entered.
  • The filing spouse must serve the other with the FL-720 and then file it with the court.
  • Once filed, the joint petition is terminated. It does not simply pause or convert.
  • The form itself explains that Petitioner 1 becomes the Petitioner and Petitioner 2 becomes the Respondent.

That’s where things get interesting. The FL-720 directs that a new Petition (FL-100) or Response (FL-120) must be filed at the same time as the revocation. Whoever files the FL-720 is, by default, starting or continuing the action as the Petitioner. The other party has 30 days after service of the revocation to file their corresponding pleading.

Here’s a quirky twist: if Petitioner 2 files the revocation, the first thing the court sees might be a Response instead of a Petition. The law doesn’t say you can’t do it, but it flips the usual order on its head. We’ll see how court staff handle this one.

If you or your spouse plan to revoke, file both the FL-720 and the proper initiating pleading on the same day, and carefully track the 30-day response period. If you receive a Notice of Revocation of Joint Petition, remember you have 30 days to respond.

A Step Toward a Less Adversarial System

This is a big step toward changing the culture of divorce in California. The California joint petition acknowledges what many of us have long known: not every divorce fits neatly into the “plaintiff versus defendant” box. For couples who want to stay out of the mud, this form opens a cleaner, kinder path, and gives families a better way to begin.

Of course, it’s still important to get sound legal and financial advice before signing anything. But all things considered, it’s a win for couples who want to stay out of the courtroom crossfire. 

african american woman working on her California joint divorce petition

Ready to move forward with respect?

Let’s talk about how the new California Joint Divorce Petition can help you divorce peacefully.

Co-parenting on Halloween:  How not to make candy night into a nightmare

Co-parenting on Halloween: How not to make candy night into a nightmare

Co-parenting on Halloween can be tricky – or it can be a treat. It depends on you!

Halloween has a way of sneaking up on even the most organized separated parents. Judges don’t usually mention it in custody orders, probably because it doesn’t come with a day off work. But let’s get real: for kids, Halloween is the Super Bowl of childhood (well, or at least the World Series). They plan plays, scout candy routes, and train their sweet tooth all month. The last thing they need is for their parents to turn their night of magic into a showdown. Give them the gift of laughter, not drama.

So, how do you keep the co-parenting on Halloween about the kids and not about your latest argument? Here are a few tricks (and treats) to keep things fun and focused on your children:

First, put Halloween in your parenting plan.

Yes, actually write it down. Decide ahead of time who gets trick-or-treating this year, or who goes to the school parade. Don’t wait until October 30th to start the debate. Clear plans mean fewer last-minute meltdowns—for everyone.

Consider doing Halloween together.

If you and your ex can handle being in the same place without the drama, great. Kids light up when both parents show up and keep things friendly. You do not have to match costumes or fake a friendship. Just keep it polite and easy. But if you know the night will turn into a horror show, skip it. Give everyone a break and keep the peace.

Let your kids have their night.

Don’t make Halloween memorable for all the wrong reasons. This isn’t the time to air your grievances or compete for Best Parent. Focus on their fun, not your own feelings.

Control the grandparents and extended family.

Sometimes, the real monsters on the scene can be the extended family.  Perhaps they don’t quite understand what this co-parenting scene is all about, and they are tempted to engage in conflict.  Stop them!  Don’t let them badmouth the other parent or start a fight. Tell them to behave themselves and follow the getting-along program before the evening even starts.

Costume drama should be left to the theater, not your living room.

Don’t turn your child’s costume choice into a tug-of-war. Talk it out ahead of time and let your kid pick what makes them happy. Remember, the goal is giggles, not power plays.

Share the Halloween joy when you can.

If it’s your night, maybe swing by the other parent’s place so the kids can show off their costumes. It’s a small gesture, but it tells your kids both parents are in their corner. If it’s not your night, don’t crash the party. Respect the boundaries and find another time to celebrate.

Co-parenting on Halloween can be sweet, like candy, or a nightmare, like a scary movie.

It all depends on whether the adults can keep it together. Give your kids a night that’s about them, not about your old arguments. Show them how grownups are supposed to behave. Halloween should be about candy and giggles, not conflict. Years from now, your kids won’t remember who bought the best costume or who had the last word.  But they will remember feeling safe and loved. That’s the real treat.

Keep the peace long after the candy’s gone.

Schedule a conversation to build a plan that keeps things sweet for your kids all year.